论文标题
通过模板解释性论证解决开放式的规则
Resolving Open-textured Rules with Templated Interpretive Arguments
论文作者
论文摘要
书面规则中的开放式术语通常是通过解释性论证来解决的。正在进行的工作试图对这种解释性论证中使用的方案进行分类。但是，这些方案的使用如何影响人们实际使用和理由对开放式术语的正确解释的方式？我们将解释性论证的游戏Aporia作为我们的框架，我们进行了一项经验研究以回答这个问题。与以前的工作不同，我们不允许参与者任意争论解释，而只能使用适合给定的解释性论点模板的参数。最后，我们分析了该新数据集捕获的结果，特别关注对具有解释能力的人工推理者的开发的实际影响。
Open-textured terms in written rules are typically settled through interpretive argumentation. Ongoing work has attempted to catalogue the schemes used in such interpretive argumentation. But how can the use of these schemes affect the way in which people actually use and reason over the proper interpretations of open-textured terms? Using the interpretive argument-eliciting game Aporia as our framework, we carried out an empirical study to answer this question. Differing from previous work, we did not allow participants to argue for interpretations arbitrarily, but to only use arguments that fit with a given set of interpretive argument templates. Finally, we analyze the results captured by this new dataset, specifically focusing on practical implications for the development of interpretation-capable artificial reasoners.
