论文标题
语言结构建筑的神经相关性：关于Kazanina＆Tavano的评论（2022）
The Neural Correlates of Linguistic Structure Building: Comments on Kazanina & Tavano (2022)
论文作者
论文摘要
Kazanina＆Tavano的最新观点论文（在下面称为KT观点）表明，神经振荡如何无法为句法结构构建提供潜在的神经相关性。神经振荡可以为句法结构建筑提供潜在的神经相关性的观点主要归因于2016年丁，梅洛尼，张，张，田和Poeppel的研究（称为DMZTP研究）。 KT的观点是令人发指的，但对DMZTP和其他研究中的论点有严重的误解，并且在视角的不同部分中包含了矛盾的结论，因此无法理解作者的位置。在下文中，我总结了KT的观点一些误解和不一致的论点，并为将来的研究提出了一些建议。
A recent perspective paper by Kazanina & Tavano (referred to as the KT perspective in the following) argues how neural oscillations cannot provide a potential neural correlate for syntactic structure building. The view that neural oscillations can provide a potential neural correlate for syntactic structure building is largely attributed to a study by Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, and Poeppel in 2016 (referred to as the DMZTP study). The KT perspective is thought provoking, but has severe misinterpretations about the arguments in DMZTP and other studies, and contains contradictory conclusions in different parts of the perspective, making it impossible to understand the position of the authors. In the following, I summarize a few misinterpretations and inconsistent arguments in the KT perspective, and put forward a few suggestions for future studies.
