论文标题

具有较高模式和旋转进动的黑洞独立星级合并的数值赋予有效的一体模型

Numerical-Relativity-Informed Effective-One-Body model for Black-Hole-Neutron-Star Mergers with Higher Modes and Spin Precession

论文作者

Gonzalez, Alejandra, Gamba, Rossella, Breschi, Matteo, Zappa, Francesco, Carullo, Gregorio, Bernuzzi, Sebastiano, Nagar, Alessandro

论文摘要

我们介绍了通用旋转准圆形黑洞的第一个有效的(EOB)模型 - 中子 - 单身星(BHNS)Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown重力引力波形(GWS)。我们的模型基于BH残留物及其响声的新数值余波(NR)知情表达。它重现了NR $(\ ell,m)=(2,2)$ waveform,并具有$ {\ lyseSim0.5} \的典型阶段一致性,$ rad($ {\ sillsim1} \,$ rad)与合并(ringdown)。 $(2,2)$和NR数据之间的最大(最小)不匹配为4%(0.6%)。包括较高模式(HMS)$(2,1)$,$(3,2)$,$(3,3)$,$(4,4)$和$(5,5)$,并且根据倾向,它们与可用NR波形的不匹配至(降至60%(1%))。与16轨前进模拟的相位比较显示NR不确定性内的差异。我们通过使用事件GW190814的HMS(和非额定旋转)以及新的$(2,2)$ - - GW200105和GW200115的新型$(2,2)$模式分析来证明该模型在GW参数估计中的适用性。对于GW190814研究,HMS的纳入给出了更严格的参数后代。我们对该事件的分析的贝叶斯因素显示出存在HMS的果断证据,但对BHNS或二进制黑洞(BBH)源没有明显的偏爱。同样,我们确认GW200105和GW200115没有显示潮汐效应的证据。

We present the first effective-one-body (EOB) model for generic-spins quasi-circular black-hole--neutron-star (BHNS) inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational waveforms (GWs). Our model is based on a new numerical-relativity (NR) informed expression of the BH remnant and its ringdown. It reproduces the NR $(\ell,m)=(2,2)$ waveform with typical phase agreement of ${\lesssim0.5}\,$rad (${\lesssim1}\,$rad) to merger (ringdown). The maximum (minimum) mismatch between the $(2,2)$ and the NR data is 4% (0.6%). Higher modes (HMs) $(2,1)$, $(3,2)$, $(3,3)$, $(4,4)$ and $(5,5)$ are included and their mismatch with the available NR waveforms are up to (down to) a 60% (1%) depending on the inclination. Phase comparison with a 16 orbit precessing simulation shows differences within the NR uncertainties. We demonstrate the applicability of the model in GW parameter estimation by perfoming the first BHNS Bayesian analysis with HMs (and non-precessing spins) of the event GW190814, together with new $(2,2)$-mode analysis of GW200105 and GW200115. For the GW190814 study, the inclusion of HMs gives tighter parameter posteriors. The Bayes factors of our analyses on this event show decisive evidence for the presence of HMs, but no clear preference for a BHNS or a binary black hole (BBH) source. Similarly, we confirm GW200105 and GW200115 show no evidence for tidal effects.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源