论文标题
删除宇宙学弱透镜分析中删除点扩展功能添加系统的一般框架
A General Framework for Removing Point Spread Function Additive Systematics in Cosmological Weak Lensing Analysis
论文作者
论文摘要
宇宙学弱透镜测量取决于对剪切两点相关函数(2PCF)的精确测量,以及对影响它的系统学的深刻理解。在这项工作中,我们展示了一个通用框架,用于检测和建模PSF系统对宇宙剪切2PCF的影响,并减轻其对宇宙学分析的影响。我们的框架可以描述使用星系形状和PSF矩之间的互相关的PSF第二次及更高矩,而不仅仅是第二次矩,而不仅仅是第二矩,从而描述了泄漏和建模误差。我们使用这种形式主义的HSC第3(Y3)目录来解释无效测试,并发现PSF第四矩的自旋2组合中的泄漏是添加剂剪切系统的主要贡献者,其总污染物的总污染比仅由PSF第二瞬间贡献了。我们对HSC Y3进行了模拟宇宙剪切分析,发现,如果未经校正,PSF Systematics可以偏向宇宙参数$ω_m$和$ s_8 $ by $ \ sim $ \ sim $ 0.3 $σ$。传统的第二瞬间模型只能校正0.1 $σ$偏置,而污染在很大程度上没有校正。我们得出结论,有必要对PSF第二和第四刻污染进行建模,以进行HSC Y3宇宙剪切分析。我们还使用更新的Systematics模型重新分析了HSC Y1宇宙剪切分析,并在使用原始分析中使用更限制的第二刻度模型时,识别$ω_m$上的0.07 $σ$偏置。我们演示了如何在真实空间和傅立叶空间中使用该方法,评估层析成像箱中的剪切系统学以及测试PSF模型过度拟合。
Cosmological weak lensing measurements rely on a precise measurement of the shear two-point correlation function (2PCF) along with a deep understanding of systematics that affect it. In this work, we demonstrate a general framework for detecting and modeling the impact of PSF systematics on the cosmic shear 2PCF, and mitigating its impact on cosmological analysis. Our framework can describe leakage and modeling error from all spin-2 quantities contributed by the PSF second and higher moments, rather than just the second moments, using the cross-correlations between galaxy shapes and PSF moments. We interpret null tests using the HSC Year 3 (Y3) catalogs with this formalism, and find that leakage from the spin-2 combination of PSF fourth moments is the leading contributor to additive shear systematics, with total contamination that is an order of magnitude higher than that contributed by PSF second moments alone. We conducted a mock cosmic shear analysis for HSC Y3, and find that, if uncorrected, PSF systematics can bias the cosmological parameters $Ω_m$ and $S_8$ by $\sim$0.3$σ$. The traditional second moment-based model can only correct for a 0.1$σ$ bias, leaving the contamination largely uncorrected. We conclude it is necessary to model both PSF second and fourth moment contamination for HSC Y3 cosmic shear analysis. We also reanalyze the HSC Y1 cosmic shear analysis with our updated systematics model, and identify a 0.07$σ$ bias on $Ω_m$ when using the more restricted second moment model from the original analysis. We demonstrate how to self-consistently use the method in both real space and Fourier space, assess shear systematics in tomographic bins, and test for PSF model overfitting.