论文标题

从证明块与写作证明的效率

Efficiency of Learning from Proof Blocks Versus Writing Proofs

论文作者

Poulsen, Seth, Gertner, Yael, Cosman, Benjamin, West, Matthew, Herman, Geoffrey L.

论文摘要

Proof Blocks是一种软件工具,可为学生提供脚手架的证明编写体验,从而使他们可以将预先编写的证明线拖入正确的顺序,而不是从头开始。在本文中,我们描述了一项随机对照试验,旨在衡量通过归纳来学习证明证明的学报的学习收益。研究参与者是完成离散数学课程的第一个月后招募的332名学生。研究中的学生对归纳进行了预测试并阅读有关证明的讲义,完成了简短的(不到1小时)的学习活动,然后一周后返回以完成后测。根据每个学生被分配给的实验条件,他们要么只完成了证明障碍问题,要么完成了一些证明问题和一些书面证明,要么仅完成了他们的学习活动的书面证明。我们发现,通过阅读讲义和使用证明块与阅读讲义和从头开始的书面证明一样,在学习证明的早期阶段的学生可以学习得一样多,但在任务上的时间却很少。这一发现补充了先前的发现,即证明块是有用的考试问题,并且由学生积极看待。

Proof Blocks is a software tool that provides students with a scaffolded proof-writing experience, allowing them to drag and drop prewritten proof lines into the correct order instead of starting from scratch. In this paper we describe a randomized controlled trial designed to measure the learning gains of using Proof Blocks for students learning proof by induction. The study participants were 332 students recruited after completing the first month of their discrete mathematics course. Students in the study took a pretest and read lecture notes on proof by induction, completed a brief (less than 1 hour) learning activity, and then returned one week later to complete the posttest. Depending on the experimental condition that each student was assigned to, they either completed only Proof Blocks problems, completed some Proof Blocks problems and some written proofs, or completed only written proofs for their learning activity. We find that students in the early phases of learning about proof by induction are able to learn just as much from reading lecture notes and using Proof Blocks as by reading lecture notes and writing proofs from scratch, but in far less time on task. This finding complements previous findings that Proof Blocks are useful exam questions and are viewed positively by students.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源