论文标题

破坏性创造,创造性破坏和创新科学的悖论

Destructive Creation, Creative Destruction, and the Paradox of Innovation Science

论文作者

Cao, Likun, Chen, Ziwen, Evans, James

论文摘要

在社会学和整个社会科学领域广泛研究了创新,社会和文化事物的新材料,社会和文化事物的创造和传播,调查足够多样化,并且分散了,以使其无法纳入。这种复杂性是由于创新对社会的重要性而引起的,也是基本的创新科学的基本悖论:当创新变得可预测时,它就会不再是新颖和变化的引擎。在这里,我们回顾了创新研究,并表明创新从不和谐和混乱的环境中出现,违反了先前成功的结构。这通常会导致一个互补的创造性破坏过程,在该过程中,本地结构可以保护和引导成功创新的扩散,从而使替代方案过时。我们发现,社会科学家自然地关注社会和文化背景如何影响物质创新,而不是相反。我们强调了为分析新颖的内容和互动中的新内容开辟新的可能性的计算工具,并展示了这是如何从经验上带给我们更广泛的可能性范围的,即复杂的系统和科学研究具有理论上的理论化和科幻小说已经想象着创新的社会,文化和物质结构,从而使彼此之间的变化通过破坏和发展的循环来调节彼此的变化。

Innovation or the creation and diffusion of new material, social and cultural things in society has been widely studied in sociology and across the social sciences, with investigations sufficiently diverse and dispersed to make them unnavigable. This complexity results from innovation's importance for society, but also the fundamental paradox underlying innovation science: When innovation becomes predictable, it ceases to be an engine of novelty and change. Here we review innovation studies and show that innovations emerge from contexts of discord and disorder, breaches in the structure of prior success, through a process we term destructive creation. This often leads to a complementary process of creative destruction whereby local structures protect and channel the diffusion of successful innovations, rendering alternatives obsolete. We find that social scientists naturally focus far more on how social and cultural contexts influence material innovations than the converse. We highlight computational tools that open new possibilities for the analysis of novel content and context in interaction, and show how this brings us empirically toward the broader range of possibilities that complex systems and science studies have theorized-and science fiction has imagined-the social, cultural and material structures of innovation conditioning each other's change through cycles of disruption and development.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源