论文标题
一个自动化的做市商最大程度地减少反之亦然
An Automated Market Maker Minimizing Loss-Versus-Rebalancing
论文作者
论文摘要
自动化做市商(AMM)的流动性总是可用,一直是早期加密货币采用的最重要的催化剂之一。但是,越来越明显的是,当前形式的AMM不是被动流动性提供商的可行投资选择。这很大程度上是由于AMM的成本为套利者提供了针对外部市场价格的陈旧价格,该价格正式为损失 - 重新平衡(LVR)[Milionis et al。,2022]。 在本文中,我们提出了钻石,这是一种自动化的市场制作协议,该协议将流动性提供者和块生产商的激励措施保持在LVR的协议级保留中。在钻石中,Block生产商有效拍卖了捕获钻石池外部市场价格和池本身价格之间存在的任何套利的权利。这些拍卖的收益是由钻石池和块生产商共享的,该方式被证明可以使块生产商保持兼容。鉴于竞争套利者参与捕获LVR,LVR在钻石中被最小化。 我们正式证明了这一结果,并详细介绍了钻石的实现。我们还提供了钻石与相关基准测试的比较模拟,进一步证明了钻石的LVR保护能力。 有了这个新的保护,区块链上的被动流动性可以在理性上可行,从而为分散的金融招募了新时代。
The always-available liquidity of automated market makers (AMMs) has been one of the most important catalysts in early cryptocurrency adoption. However, it has become increasingly evident that AMMs in their current form are not viable investment options for passive liquidity providers. This is large part due to the cost incurred by AMMs providing stale prices to arbitrageurs against external market prices, formalized as loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) [Milionis et al., 2022]. In this paper, we present Diamond, an automated market making protocol that aligns the incentives of liquidity providers and block producers in the protocol-level retention of LVR. In Diamond, block producers effectively auction the right to capture any arbitrage that exists between the external market price of a Diamond pool, and the price of the pool itself. The proceeds of these auctions are shared by the Diamond pool and block producer in a way that is proven to remain incentive compatible for the block producer. Given the participation of competing arbitrageurs to capture LVR, LVR is minimized in Diamond. We formally prove this result, and detail an implementation of Diamond. We also provide comparative simulations of Diamond to relevant benchmarks, further evidencing the LVR-protection capabilities of Diamond. With this new protection, passive liquidity provision on blockchains can become rationally viable, beckoning a new age for decentralized finance.