论文标题

深度学习研究中基于图的方法的科学影响 - 文献计量比较

Scientific Impact of Graph-Based Approaches in Deep Learning Studies -- A Bibliometric Comparison

论文作者

Turker, Ilker, Tan, Serhat Orkun

论文摘要

在深度学习中应用基于图的方法会随着时间的流逝而受到更多关注。这项研究对在深度学习中使用基于图的方法进行了统计分析,并研究了相关文章的科学影响。分析了从科学数据库获得的数据,例如文章类型,资金可用性,索引类型,年平均引用数量和访问次数,以定量揭示对科学受众的影响。概述的是,基于深度学习的研究在2013年之后获得了动力,并且在接下来的10年内,所有深度学习研究中基于图的方法的速度从1%增加到4%。会议出版物在会议程序引文指数(CPCI)中扫描了基于图的方法的引文大大增加。 SCI扩展和新兴的SCI索引出版物的引文计数彼此接近。尽管双方受支持和不支持的出版物的引文表演相似,但纯粹的深度学习研究在期刊出版物方和基于图的方法上获得了更多引用,并在会议方面获得了更多的引用。尽管近年来表现相似,但基于图的研究表明,与传统方法相比,随着年龄的增长,引用性能的两倍。所有深度学习研究的年度平均引文表现在2014年为11.051,而基于图的研究为22.483。另外,尽管获得了16%的访问权限,但基于图的论文随着纯粹的对应而获得的总体引用几乎相同。这表明基于图的方法需要更多的关注才能遵循,而纯净的深度学习对应物相对简单地进入内部。

Applying graph-based approaches in deep learning receives more attention over time. This study presents statistical analysis on the use of graph-based approaches in deep learning and examines the scientific impact of the related articles. Processing the data obtained from the Web of Science database, metrics such as the type of the articles, funding availability, indexing type, annual average number of citations and the number of access were analyzed to quantitatively reveal the effects on the scientific audience. It's outlined that deep learning-based studies gained momentum after year 2013, and the rate of graph-based approaches in all deep learning studies increased linearly from 1% to 4% within the following 10 years. Conference publications scanned in the Conference Proceeding Citation Index (CPCI) on the graph-based approaches receive significantly more citations. The citation counts of the SCI-Expanded and Emerging SCI indexed publications of the two streams are close to each other. While the citation performances of the supported and unsupported publications of the two sides were similar, pure deep learning studies received more citations on the journal publication side and graph-based approaches received more citations on the conference side. Despite their similar performance in recent years, graph-based studies show twice more citation performance as they get older, compared to traditional approaches. Annual average citation performance per article for all deep learning studies is 11.051 in 2014, while it is 22.483 for graph-based studies. Also, despite receiving 16% more access, graph-based papers get almost the same overall citation over time with the pure counterpart. This is an indication that graph-based approaches need a greater bunch of attention to follow, while pure deep learning counterpart is relatively simpler to get inside.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源