论文标题
休息时(人)呼吸率
The (human) respiratory rate at rest
论文作者
论文摘要
所有学童都知道他们呼吸的频率,但即使是专家也不知道为什么。该出版物的目的是利用生理,物理和数学方法来开发静止自发的呼吸速率的模型,该原则的原理是进化将生理学推动到尽可能经济的方向。然后,呼吸速率是从有机体的参数二氧化碳产生速率,抗性,静态依从性和肺部死空间的方程式之后,灵感持续时间:到期持续时间 - 比率 - 比率和验证二氧化碳的比例。该派生需要仅中学数学。以成年人或新生儿童的示例,来自文献的数据在静止时导致其呼吸率正常。与成年人相比,新生人的呼吸率更高的原因是二氧化碳产量相对较高,以及肺的依从性相对较低。一个侧面的结果是,整个肺部的常见肺泡压和常见的时间常数也是经济原理的结果。由于上述参数不是人类特异性的,因此没有理由假设上述方程也不能适用于许多动物通过胸腔内的肺呼吸,尤其是哺乳动物。不仅生理和生物学,而且医学也可以受益:在包括病理生理在内的肺功能诊断中讨论了适用性。但是,本出版物仅声称是自发安静呼吸率的理论概念。在没有类似动物数据的情况下,该出版物旨在鼓励进一步的科学测试。
All schoolchildren know how often they breathe, but even experts don't know exactly why. The aim of this publication is to develop a model of the resting spontaneous breathing rate using physiological, physical and mathematical methods with the aid of the principle that evolution pushes physiology in a direction that is as economical as possible. The respiratory rate then follows from an equation with the parameters CO2-production rate of the organism, resistance, static compliance and dead space of the lungs, the inspiration duration: expiration duration - ratio and the end-expiratory CO2 fraction. The derivation requires exclusively secondary school mathematics. Using the example of an adult human or a newborn child, data from the literature then result in normal values for their breathing rate at rest. The reason for the higher respiratory rate of a newborn human compared to an adult is the relatively high CO2-production rate together with the comparatively low compliance of the lungs. A side result is the fact that the common alveolar pressure throughout the lungs and the common time constant is a consequence of the economical principle as well. Since the above parameters are not human-specific, there is no reason to assume that the above equation could not also be applicable to many animals breathing through lungs within a thorax, especially mammals. Not only physiology and biology, but also medicine, could benefit: Applicability is being discussed in pulmonary function diagnostics, including pathophysiology. However, the present publication only claims to be a theoretical concept for the spontaneous quiet breathing rate. In the absence of comparable animal data, this publication is intended to encourage further scientific tests.