论文标题
暗物质光环芯和银河系卫星的潮汐生存
Dark matter halo cores and the tidal survival of Milky Way satellites
论文作者
论文摘要
冷暗物质(CDM)光环的cuspy中央密度曲线使它们对潮汐的破坏高度韧性。暗物质颗粒或重子的循环之间的自相互作用可能导致形成恒定密度的核心,这会使光环更容易受到潮汐破坏的影响。我们使用N体模拟来研究大型宿主潮汐场中NFW样的“ Cored”次隆的演变,并确定全面潮汐破坏的标准和时间标准。我们的结果表明,银河系卫星的生存对暗物质核心的尺寸施加了约束。实际上,我们发现没有大于其初始NFW尺度半径大于1%的核心的亚卤素无法在围绕围绕轨道<10 kpc的轨道上生存。像Tucana 3这样的卫星,具有围腹〜3.5 kpc的卫星必须具有小于〜2 pc的核心大小,才能在其当前轨道上生存三个轨道时期。自我相互作用的暗物质(SIDM)模型的核心尺寸与速度无关的横截面为1 cm^2/g,似乎与具有小围式半径的超生物卫星不相容,例如TUC 3,seg 1,seg 1,seg 2,seg 2,ret 2,tri 2,tri 2,以及这些都应该完全破坏,并在10上均被隔离。这些结果表明,许多卫星的核心大小消失了,与CDM尖齿一致。在带有小周围半径的轨道上发现了更远的银河系卫星将加强这些结论,并在核心尺寸上更严格的上限。
The cuspy central density profiles of cold dark matter (CDM) haloes make them highly resilient to disruption by tides. Self-interactions between dark matter particles, or the cycling of baryons, may result in the formation of a constant-density core which would make haloes more susceptible to tidal disruption. We use N-body simulations to study the evolution of NFW-like "cored" subhaloes in the tidal field of a massive host, and identify the criteria and timescales for full tidal disruption. Our results imply that the survival of Milky Way satellites places constraints on the sizes of dark matter cores. Indeed, we find that no subhaloes with cores larger than 1 per cent of their initial NFW scale radius can survive for a Hubble time on orbits with pericentres <10 kpc. A satellite like Tucana 3, with pericentre ~3.5 kpc, must have a core size smaller than ~2 pc to survive just three orbital periods on its current orbit. The core sizes expected in self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) models with a velocity-independent cross section of 1 cm^2/g seem incompatible with ultra-faint satellites with small pericentric radii, such as Tuc 3, Seg 1, Seg 2, Ret 2, Tri 2, and Wil 1, as these should have fully disrupted if accreted on to the Milky Way >10 Gyr ago. These results suggest that many satellites have vanishingly small core sizes, consistent with CDM cusps. The discovery of further Milky Way satellites on orbits with small pericentric radii would strengthen these conclusions and allow for stricter upper limits on the core sizes.