论文标题
有效的灾难疏散方法,类似于共同的大流行
Effective approaches to disaster evacuation during a COVID-like pandemic
论文作者
论文摘要
由于Covid-19-19疫苗可用,因此没有研究量化不同的灾难疏散策略如何减轻庇护所大流行风险。因此,我们应用了一个年龄结构化的流行病学模型,称为易感性暴露感染(SEIR)模型,以研究台湾不同的疫苗摄取水平以及在台湾实施的不同疫苗摄取水平以及延迟流行症峰值的程度。台湾的转移协议涉及转移因曝光而自我占用的人,从而阻止了他们与聚会庇护所的普通公众融合。转移方案,结合足够的疫苗吸收,可以减少相对于没有这种策略的情况,相对于场景,最大的感染数量和延迟爆发。如果不可能进行所有暴露的人的转移,或者疫苗的吸收不足,那么转移方案仍然很有价值。此外,一组主要由年轻人人口组成的撤离者往往会早日出现大流行峰值,并且在实施转移方案时,多数老年人组的感染比多数老年人多。但是,当不执行转移方案时,多数老年人组的严重案例比大多数年轻成人群体高20%。
Since COVID-19 vaccines became available, no studies have quantified how different disaster evacuation strategies can mitigate pandemic risks in shelters. Therefore, we applied an age-structured epidemiological model, known as the Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model, to investigate to what extent different vaccine uptake levels and the Diversion protocol implemented in Taiwan decrease infections and delay pandemic peak occurrences. Taiwan's Diversion protocol involves diverting those in self-quarantine due to exposure, thus preventing them from mingling with the general public at a congregate shelter. The Diversion protocol, combined with sufficient vaccine uptake, can decrease the maximum number of infections and delay outbreaks relative to scenarios without such strategies. When the diversion of all exposed people is not possible, or vaccine uptake is insufficient, the Diversion protocol is still valuable. Furthermore, a group of evacuees that consists primarily of a young adult population tends to experience pandemic peak occurrences sooner and have up to 180% more infections than does a majority elderly group when the Diversion protocol is implemented. However, when the Diversion protocol is not enforced, the majority elderly group suffers from up to 20% more severe cases than the majority young adult group.