论文标题

量子技术的民主化

Democratization of Quantum Technologies

论文作者

Seskir, Zeki C., Umbrello, Steven, Coenen, Christopher, Vermaas, Pieter E.

论文摘要

随着量子技术(QT)的发展,它们对社会的潜在影响和关系一直在发展成为探索的重要问题。在本文中,我们在QT的背景下调查了民主化的话题,尤其是量子计算。本文包含三个主要部分。首先,我们简要介绍了民主的不同理论(参与性,代表和审议),以及如何将民主化的概念相对于是否被视为内在或工具价值。其次,我们概述了如何在QT领域使用民主化的概念。民主化主要是由从事量子计算的公司采用的,并将其用于对该概念的非常狭窄的理解。第三,我们探讨了有关QT民主化的各种叙述和反叙事。最后,我们探讨了民主化在QT中的一般努力,例如不同形式的获取,基层社区和特殊利益群体的形成,宣言写作的新兴文化,以及如何将这些文化位于民主的不同理论中。总而言之,我们认为,尽管QT民主化的持续努力是朝着这套新兴技术民主化的必要步骤,但它们不应被接受为足以说明QT是一个民主化的领域。我们认为,关于QT领域行为者采用的叙述和行动的反思性和响应能力,以及对QT显式民主化的持续努力的基本假设可以为社会带来更好的技术。

As quantum technologies (QT) advance, their potential impact on and relation with society has been developing into an important issue for exploration. In this paper, we investigate the topic of democratization in the context of QT, particularly quantum computing. The paper contains three main sections. First, we briefly introduce different theories of democracy (participatory, representative, and deliberative) and how the concept of democratization can be formulated with respect to whether democracy is taken as an intrinsic or instrumental value. Second, we give an overview of how the concept of democratization is used in the QT field. Democratization is mainly adopted by companies working on quantum computing and used in a very narrow understanding of the concept. Third, we explore various narratives and counter-narratives concerning democratization in QT. Finally, we explore the general efforts of democratization in QT such as different forms of access, formation of grassroot communities and special interest groups, the emerging culture of manifesto writing, and how these can be located within the different theories of democracy. In conclusion, we argue that although the ongoing efforts in the democratization of QT are necessary steps towards the democratization of this set of emerging technologies, they should not be accepted as sufficient to argue that QT is a democratized field. We argue that more reflexivity and responsiveness regarding the narratives and actions adopted by the actors in the QT field, and making the underlying assumptions of ongoing efforts on democratization of QT explicit, can result in a better technology for society.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源