论文标题

Hypergraph Moore绑定的简单而又更加清晰的证明

A simple and sharper proof of the hypergraph Moore bound

论文作者

Hsieh, Jun-Ting, Kothari, Pravesh K., Mohanty, Sidhanth

论文摘要

HyperGraph Moore Bound是一个优雅的陈述,表征了周长之间的极端权衡 - 最小循环甚至覆盖物(甚至具有所有程度的次透明)和大小 - 超图中的Hyperedge的数量。对于图形(即$ 2 $ - 均匀的超图),在Alon,Hoorory和Linial的经典作品中证明了与领先常数的紧密结合[AHL02]。对于均匀性的超图$ k> 2 $,Feige [FEI08]提出了适当的概括。在Guruswami,Kothari和Manohar [GKM21]的最新工作中,猜想被安置为额外的$ \ log^{4k+1} n $因子。他们的论点依赖于短短覆盖物的存在与某个随机签名的Kikuchi矩阵之间的联系。他们的分析,尤其是对于Odd $ K $的情况,非常复杂。 在这项工作中,我们提供了超图摩尔绑定的更简单,更短的证明。我们的关键想法是使用新的重量校园矩阵和边缘删除步骤,该步骤使我们能够在[GKM21]的分析中删除几个涉及步骤,例如Kikuchi Matrix行的组合和使用Schudy-sviridenko Polynomial浓度的组合。我们的简单证明还获得了更严格的参数:特别是,该参数提供了[AHL02]的经典摩尔界限的新证明,而没有损失([GKM21]中的证明损失了$ \ log^3 n $ factor),并且仅丢失了所有$ k> 2 $ - 2 $均匀的均匀的超graphs的单个对数因子。 就像在[GKM21]中一样,我们的想法自然而然地扩展到了更简单的证明,以证明完整的权衡,以强烈反驳同样改进的参数的约束满意度问题的平滑实例。

The hypergraph Moore bound is an elegant statement that characterizes the extremal trade-off between the girth - the number of hyperedges in the smallest cycle or even cover (a subhypergraph with all degrees even) and size - the number of hyperedges in a hypergraph. For graphs (i.e., $2$-uniform hypergraphs), a bound tight up to the leading constant was proven in a classical work of Alon, Hoory and Linial [AHL02]. For hypergraphs of uniformity $k>2$, an appropriate generalization was conjectured by Feige [Fei08]. The conjecture was settled up to an additional $\log^{4k+1} n$ factor in the size in a recent work of Guruswami, Kothari and Manohar [GKM21]. Their argument relies on a connection between the existence of short even covers and the spectrum of a certain randomly signed Kikuchi matrix. Their analysis, especially for the case of odd $k$, is significantly complicated. In this work, we present a substantially simpler and shorter proof of the hypergraph Moore bound. Our key idea is the use of a new reweighted Kikuchi matrix and an edge deletion step that allows us to drop several involved steps in [GKM21]'s analysis such as combinatorial bucketing of rows of the Kikuchi matrix and the use of the Schudy-Sviridenko polynomial concentration. Our simpler proof also obtains tighter parameters: in particular, the argument gives a new proof of the classical Moore bound of [AHL02] with no loss (the proof in [GKM21] loses a $\log^3 n$ factor), and loses only a single logarithmic factor for all $k>2$-uniform hypergraphs. As in [GKM21], our ideas naturally extend to yield a simpler proof of the full trade-off for strongly refuting smoothed instances of constraint satisfaction problems with similarly improved parameters.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源