论文标题

使用反卷积提高了冠状动脉CAL-CIFICATION的准确性和可重复性

Improved accuracy and reproducibility of coronary artery cal-cification features using deconvolution

论文作者

Song, Yingnan, Hoori, Ammar, Wu, Hao, Vembar, Mani, Al-Kindi, Sadeer, Ciancibello, Leslie, Terry, James G., Jacobs Jr, David R., Carr, John Jeffrey, Wilson, David L.

论文摘要

我们的远程目标是通过从单个钙化中提取定量特征来提高当前的全心CT钙评分。我们进行了反卷积以改善小钙化评估,以挑战常规的CT钙评分扫描分辨率。我们分析了从QRM-Cardio Phantom,Cadaver Hearts和Cardia研究参与者中重复标准(2.5毫米)和薄(1.25毫米)切片扫描的单个钙化特征。通过测量的PSF或3D盲解卷积,预处理涉及露西·里奇森(Lucy-Richardson)反卷积的分辨率,其中PSF在图像中的钙化等高细节结构(如钙化)上进行了迭代优化。使用QRM与具有已知MG-钙的插入物的插入物,我们确定盲和常规反向卷积的改进质量测量在标准图像上几乎同样好。此外,撤离薄图像可以很好地恢复实际的质量评分,这表明这种处理可能是我们的黄金标准。对于Cardia图像,盲目卷积大大改善了标准切片的结果。对于Agatston,体积和质量评分,分别在33次钙化(没有反卷积)的准确性(没有反卷积)为(23%,9%),(18%,1%)和(-19%,-1%)。可重复性分别为(0.13,0.10),(0.12,0.08)和(0.11,0.06)。质量得分比Agatston评分或Vol-um分数更可重复。通过测量的PSF,尸体量显示出类似的准确性/可重复性和稍好的结果。对于Cardia数据中的许多其他钙化特征,盲卷卷积提高了24个功能中的21个。反卷积提高了从CT Calcium评分检查中从单个钙化中提取的多个特征的准确性和可重复性。盲卷积改善了存档数据集中冠状动脉钙化的特征评估。

Our long-range goal is to improve current whole-heart CT calcium score by extracting quantitative features from individual calcifications. We performed deconvolution to improve small calcifications assessment which challenge conventional CT calcium score scanning resolution. We analyzed features of individual calcifications on repeated standard (2.5-mm) and thin (1.25-mm) slice scans from QRM-Cardio phantom, cadaver hearts, and CARDIA study participants. Pre-processing to improve resolution involved of Lucy-Richardson deconvolution with a measured PSF or 3D blind deconvolution where the PSF was iteratively optimized on high detail structures like calcifications in the images. Using QRM with inserts having known mg-calcium, we determined that both blind and conventional deconvolution improved mass measurements nearly equally well on standard images. Further, de-convolved thin images gave excellent recovery of actual mass scores, suggesting that such processing could be our gold standard. For CARDIA images, blind deconvolution greatly improved results on standard slices. Accuracy across 33 calcifications (without, with deconvolution) was (23%,9%), (18%,1%), and (-19%,-1%), for Agatston, volume, and mass scores, respectively. Reproducibility was (0.13,0.10), (0.12,0.08), and (0.11,0.06), respectively. Mass scores were more reproducible than Agatston scores or vol-ume scores. Cadaver volumes showed similar improvements in accuracy/reproducibility and slightly better results with a measured PSF. For many other calcification features in CARDIA data, blind deconvolution improved reproducibility in 21 out of 24 features. Deconvolution improves accuracy and reproducibility of multiple features extracted from individual calcifications in CT calcium score exam. Blind deconvolution improves feature assessments of coronary calcification in archived datasets.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源