论文标题
估计假阳性筛查测试结果的终身风险
Estimating the lifetime risk of a false positive screening test result
论文作者
论文摘要
筛查测试中的假阳性结果可能会对接受者产生严重的心理,医疗和财务后果。但是,几乎没有努力量化假阳性的风险如何随着时间的流逝而积累。我们试图通过估计遵守美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)筛查指南的个人将在一生中至少获得一个假阳性的可能性来填补这一空白。为此,我们组装了USPSTF引用的116项研究的数据集,该数据报告了对五种癌症或六种性传播疾病之一的主要筛查程序的真实阳性,假否定性,真正的消极和误报的数量。我们使用这些数据来估计14个人群亚群之一中的一个人将在一生中对这些十一疾病中的一种至少一种假阳性的概率。我们指定了一个合适的统计模型来说明数据的层次结构,并使用参数bootstrap来量化估计值周围的不确定性。估计的一生中至少收到一个假阳性的可能性分别为85.5%($ \ pm $ 0.9%)和38.9%($ \ pm $ 3.6%)的男女组分别为38.9%($ \ pm $ 3.6%)。建议的亚人群比基线更频繁地筛选筛查,包括更脆弱的群体,例如与男性发生性关系的孕妇和男性。由于筛选技术是不完美的,因此假阳性仍然不可避免。假阳性的高终生风险揭示了对患者有关这种现象的重要性。
False positive results in screening tests have potentially severe psychological, medical, and financial consequences for the recipient. However, there have been few efforts to quantify how the risk of a false positive accumulates over time. We seek to fill this gap by estimating the probability that an individual who adheres to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines will receive at least one false positive in a lifetime. To do so, we assembled a data set of 116 studies cited by the USPSTF that report the number of true positives, false negatives, true negatives, and false positives for the primary screening procedure for one of five cancers or six sexually transmitted diseases. We use these data to estimate the probability that an individual in one of 14 demographic subpopulations will receive at least one false positive for one of these eleven diseases in a lifetime. We specify a suitable statistical model to account for the hierarchical structure of the data, and we use the parametric bootstrap to quantify the uncertainty surrounding our estimates. The estimated probability of receiving at least one false positive in a lifetime is 85.5% ($\pm$0.9%) and 38.9% ($\pm$3.6%) for baseline groups of women and men, respectively. It is higher for subpopulations recommended to screen more frequently than the baseline, including more vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and men who have sex with men. Since screening technology is imperfect, false positives remain inevitable. The high lifetime risk of a false positive reveals the importance of educating patients about this phenomenon.