论文标题

公平部电力分配算法

Fair Division Algorithms for Electricity Distribution

论文作者

Baghel, Dinesh Kumar, Levit, Vadim E., Segal-Halevi, Erel

论文摘要

在许多发展中国家,总电力需求大于电站的有限发电能力。许多国家采用常规负载脱落的常见做法 - 与整个区域断开电源 - 以保持需求和供应之间的平衡。负载脱落会导致家庭造成困难和不适,这对于那些需要电力需要比其他人高的人高的人不公平,因此不公平。最近,Oluwasuji等人。 [2020]提出了这个问题,并提出了几种启发式解决方案。在这项工作中,我们将电力分配问题研究为公平分裂的问题,使用有关切割蛋糕问题的相关文献进行建模,并讨论一些有关分配时间间隔的部分时间间隔的一些见解。我们考虑四种情况:相同的需求,统一的公用事业;相同的需求,添加剂公用事业;不同的需求,统一的公用事业;不同的需求,添加剂实用程序。我们为前两种情况提供了解决方案,并讨论了与其余案例有关的Q-Times bin包装的新概念。我们还展示了第四案与共识K分割问题有关。可以使用功利主义和平等主义社会福利指标研究目标和约束,并试图使削减数量保持尽可能小。次要目标可以是最大程度地减少代理之间的最大效用差异。

In many developing countries, the total electricity demand is larger than the limited generation capacity of power stations. Many countries adopt the common practice of routine load shedding - disconnecting entire regions from the power supply - to maintain a balance between demand and supply. Load shedding results in inflicting hardship and discomfort on households, which is even worse and hence unfair to those whose need for electricity is higher than that of others during load shedding hours. Recently, Oluwasuji et al. [2020] presented this problem and suggested several heuristic solutions. In this work, we study the electricity distribution problem as a problem of fair division, model it using the related literature on cake-cutting problems, and discuss some insights on which parts of the time intervals are allocated to each household. We consider four cases: identical demand, uniform utilities; identical demand, additive utilities; different demand, uniform utilities; different demand, additive utilities. We provide the solution for the first two cases and discuss the novel concept of q-times bin packing in relation to the remaining cases. We also show how the fourth case is related to the consensus k-division problem. One can study objectives and constraints using utilitarian and egalitarian social welfare metrics, as well as trying to keep the number of cuts as small as possible. A secondary objective can be to minimize the maximum utility-difference between agents.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源