论文标题

SN2020QLB:一种富有特征光曲线曲线的氢贫民超小超新星

SN2020qlb: A hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with well-characterized light curve undulations

论文作者

West, S. L., Lunnan, R., Omand, C. M. B., Kangas, T., Schulze, S., Strotjohann, N., Yang, S., Fransson, C., Sollerman, J., Perley, D., Yan, L., Chen, T. -W., Chen, Z. H., Taggart, K., Fremling, C., Bloom, J. S., Drake, A., Graham, M. J., Kasliwal, M. M., Laher, R., Medford, M. S., Neill, J. D., Riddle, R., Shupe, D.

论文摘要

SN \,2020QLB(ZTF20ABOBPCB)是一种富有贫于氢的超浮肿超新星(SLSN-I),是最发光的(最大M $ _ {G} = -22.25 $ MAG)之一,是最长的上升时间之一(从爆炸到最大爆炸时间为77天)。我们估计总辐射能量为$> 2.1 \ times10^{51} $ erg。 SN \,2020QLB的采样光曲线,在峰值起伏的附近和峰值后表现出清晰的光曲线,这是其他SLSNE中看到的现象,其物理来源仍然未知。我们讨论了这种巨大爆炸的潜在动力来源以及其观察到的光曲线起伏背后的机制。我们分析光谱光谱并将其与其他SLSNE-I进行比较。我们使用来自Zwicky瞬态设施(ZTF),Liverpool望远镜(LT)和Neil Gehrels Swift天文台的大量观测数据集的光度法构建了降压光曲线,并将其与放射性,偶然性,偶然性相互作用和磁性模型进行比较。分析模型残差和光曲线多项式拟合残差,以估计起伏的时间尺度和振幅。我们还基于成像和光谱数据确定了宿主星系性能,包括检测[O III] $λ$ 4363,Auroral Line,允许进行直接的金属度测量。由于非物理参数结果,我们排除了SN \,2020QLB的光曲线的Arnett $^{56} $ ni衰减模型。我们最喜欢的电源是磁铁的磁偶极旋转能量沉积。在磁场模型残差中发现了两到三个近峰值振荡,与SN \ 20150亿的有趣相似,其时间尺度为$ 32 \ pm6 $ DAME,峰值亮度的振幅为6 $ \%$。由于时间尺度的考虑,我们排除了位于集中的起伏来源;我们赞成与围墙材料(CSM)密度波动作为起伏的来源的射流相互作用的结果。

SN\,2020qlb (ZTF20abobpcb) is a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) that is among the most luminous (maximum M$_{g} = -22.25$ mag) and that has one of the longest rise times (77 days from explosion to maximum). We estimate the total radiated energy to be $>2.1\times10^{51}$ erg. SN\,2020qlb has a well-sampled light curve that exhibits clear near and post peak undulations, a phenomenon seen in other SLSNe, whose physical origin is still unknown. We discuss the potential power source of this immense explosion as well as the mechanisms behind its observed light curve undulations. We analyze photospheric spectra and compare them to other SLSNe-I. We constructed the bolometric light curve using photometry from a large data set of observations from the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), Liverpool Telescope (LT), and Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory and compare it with radioactive, circumstellar interaction and magnetar models. Model residuals and light curve polynomial fit residuals are analyzed to estimate the undulation timescale and amplitude. We also determine host galaxy properties based on imaging and spectroscopy data, including a detection of the [O III]$λ$4363, auroral line, allowing for a direct metallicity measurement. We rule out the Arnett $^{56}$Ni decay model for SN\,2020qlb's light curve due to unphysical parameter results. Our most favored power source is the magnetic dipole spin-down energy deposition of a magnetar. Two to three near peak oscillations, intriguingly similar to those of SN\,2015bn, were found in the magnetar model residuals with a timescale of $32\pm6$ days and an amplitude of 6$\%$ of peak luminosity. We rule out centrally located undulation sources due to timescale considerations; and we favor the result of ejecta interactions with circumstellar material (CSM) density fluctuations as the source of the undulations.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源