论文标题
心电图生物识别识别:审查,系统建议和基准评估
ECG Biometric Recognition: Review, System Proposal, and Benchmark Evaluation
论文作者
论文摘要
与其他生物识别性状相比,心电图(ECG)显示出独特的模式,可以区分不同的受试者和目前的重要优势,例如难以伪造,livesection检测和无处不在。同样,随着深度学习技术的成功,近年来,心电图生物识别识别引起了人们的兴趣。但是,主要是由于缺乏公共数据和标准实验方案,评估新型心电图提出的方法的改进并不容易。在这项研究中,我们对ECG生物识别识别中不同情况进行了广泛的分析和比较。研究验证和识别任务以及单课和多课程的情况。最后,我们还执行了单铅和多领的心电图实验,考虑了传统的场景使用胸部和四肢的电极以及当前用户友好的可穿戴设备。 此外,我们提出了Ecgxtractor,这是一种具有内部大规模数据库训练的强大深度学习技术,并能够在各种情况和多个数据库中成功运行。我们介绍了我们提出的功能提取器,该功能提取器训练有多个属于55,967名受试者的鼻窦节律心跳,并提供了具有详细的实验协议的一般公共基准评估。我们评估了四个不同数据库的系统性能:i)我们的内部数据库,ii)PTB,III)ECG-ID和IV)CYBHI。使用广泛使用的PTB数据库,我们在验证中达到了0.14%和2.06%的误差率,并在识别中分别达到100%和96.46%的精度,分别在单一和多课程分析中。我们在Github中发布了源代码,实验协议详细信息和预训练的模型,以在现场推进。
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) have shown unique patterns to distinguish between different subjects and present important advantages compared to other biometric traits, such as difficulty to counterfeit, liveness detection, and ubiquity. Also, with the success of Deep Learning technologies, ECG biometric recognition has received increasing interest in recent years. However, it is not easy to evaluate the improvements of novel ECG proposed methods, mainly due to the lack of public data and standard experimental protocols. In this study, we perform extensive analysis and comparison of different scenarios in ECG biometric recognition. Both verification and identification tasks are investigated, as well as single- and multi-session scenarios. Finally, we also perform single- and multi-lead ECG experiments, considering traditional scenarios using electrodes in the chest and limbs and current user-friendly wearable devices. In addition, we present ECGXtractor, a robust Deep Learning technology trained with an in-house large-scale database and able to operate successfully across various scenarios and multiple databases. We introduce our proposed feature extractor, trained with multiple sinus-rhythm heartbeats belonging to 55,967 subjects, and provide a general public benchmark evaluation with detailed experimental protocol. We evaluate the system performance over four different databases: i) our in-house database, ii) PTB, iii) ECG-ID, and iv) CYBHi. With the widely used PTB database, we achieve Equal Error Rates of 0.14% and 2.06% in verification, and accuracies of 100% and 96.46% in identification, respectively in single- and multi-session analysis. We release the source code, experimental protocol details, and pre-trained models in GitHub to advance in the field.