论文标题
分段流动共享市场中规模的经济和规模不经济
Economies and Diseconomies of Scale in Segmented Mobility Sharing Markets
论文作者
论文摘要
由一家或多家运输网络公司(TNC)提供的按需移动性共享通过实时优化算法来实现,以连接成千上万的驾驶员和同伴的旅行中的旅行。在由TNC组成的流动性共享市场中,有两个相互竞争的原则,网络规模的经济和TNC之间的健康竞争,这可能会导致市场的“细分”。要了解这两个竞争原则的实质性和关系,我们需要回答由于市场细分而产生的效率损失以及哪些因素与之相关的效率损失。在这里,我们展示了市场结构的四个关键因素和流动共享服务的特征 - 旅行密度(厚度),最大绕行允许共享(紧密),市场份额(不平衡)和TNCS的空间隔离(溶解)与效率损失相关,与效率损失相关,与效率损失相关联,与车辆英里相差(VMT的不同市场)相关。我们发现1)虽然VMT显示出具有厚度的简单功率函数,但相应的指数项可以表示为具有紧密度的非单调函数 - 本质上显示了该市场中规模的经济和不经济性如何出现,并且看起来与Lennard-Jones-Jones模型非常相似。 2)当不平衡接近0.5(50-50的市场份额)并且溶解度较大时,效率损失较高。我们的结果对如何产生市场细分的效率低以及通过市场机制设计可以避免它的潜力进行全面分析。
On-demand mobility sharing, provided by one or several transportation network companies (TNCs), is realized by real-time optimization algorithms to connect trips among tens of thousands of drivers and fellow passengers. In a market of mobility sharing comprised of TNCs, there are two competing principles, the economies of network scale and the healthy competition between TNCs, which can lead to "segmentation" of market. To understand the substantiality and relationship of the two competing principles, we need to answer how much efficiency loss is generated due to the segmentation of market, and which factors are related to it. Here we show how four critical factors of market structure and characteristics of mobility sharing services -- density of trips (thickness), maximum detour allowed for sharing (tightness), market shares (unevenness), and spatial segregation of the TNCs (dissolvedness) -- are associated with the efficiency loss, represented as the difference in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) under different market structures. We found that 1) while VMT shows a simple power function with thickness, the corresponding exponent term can be expressed as a non-monotonic function with tightness -- essentially showing how economies and diseconomies of scale in this market arise, and appearing a very similar form to the Lennard--Jones model in inter-molecular potentials; and 2) the efficiency loss is higher when unevenness is closer to 0.5 (50-50 market share) and dissolvedness is larger. Our results give a comprehensive analysis of how the inefficiency of market segmentation is generated, and how potentially it may be avoided through market mechanism design.