论文标题
可再生能源社区:他们在法兰德斯有业务案例吗?
Renewable energy communities: do they have a business case in Flanders?
论文作者
论文摘要
可再生能源社区(REC)是为最终消费者在能源领域发挥积极作用的重要举措,提高对可再生能源(RE)技术重要性的认识,并提高其在能源系统中的份额,从而减少温室气体的发电。但是,REC的经济生存能力取决于多个相互依存的因素,这些因素需要为每个单独的情况进行仔细检查。这项研究旨在调查电价的影响,供暖和运输部门的电气化比率,RE技术和存储系统的价格以及内部电力交易价格对电力提供REC的年成本的影响。开发了一种混合力的线性模型,以最大程度地减少比利时法兰德斯代表性REC的能源提供成本。结果表明,与业务相比,REC有可能将这些成本降低10%至26%。降低的成本取决于电价的类型以及弹性资产的吸收水平,例如热泵和电动汽车。向高电价中高电力组件的转变使电力存储系统更具吸引力,从而导致电力自消耗更高。柔性资产的引入增加了当关税较低时转移需求的可能性,并且由于总电力需求的增加,因此在经济上可行的光伏系统尺寸更大。但是,在最佳情况下,与单个智能 - 主人相比,REC的成本降低仅为4%-6%。源于法规和建立REC的成本的不确定性可能会降低估计收益。
Renewable energy communities (RECs) are prominent initiatives to provide end consumers an active role in the energy sector, raise awareness on the importance of renewable energy (RE) technologies and increase their share in the energy system thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The economic viability of RECs though, depends on multiple interdependent factors that require careful examination for each individual context. This study aims at investigating the impact of electricity tariffs, ratio of electrification of heating and transportation sectors, prices of RE technologies and storage systems, and internal electricity exchange prices on the annual cost for electricity provision of a REC. A mixed-integer linear model is developed to minimize energy provision costs for a representative REC in Flanders, Belgium. The results indicate that RECs have the potential to reduce these costs by 10 to 26% compared to business-as-usual. This cost reduction depends on the type of electricity tariffs and the level of uptake of flexible assets such as heat pumps and electric vehicles. The shift towards a higher power component in the electricity tariff makes electricity storage systems more attractive, which leads to higher electricity self-consumption. The introduction of flexible assets adds the possibility to shift demand when tariffs are lower and makes larger sizes of photovoltaic systems economically viable due to the increase in the total electricity demand. However, RECs cost reduction compared to individual smart-homes amounts to only 4% - 6% in the best cases. Uncertainties stemming from the regulation and the costs of setting up a REC may reduce the estimated benefits.