论文标题
卵石生长的化学反馈:对CO耗竭和C/O比的影响
Chemical Feedbacks of Pebble Growth: Impacts on CO depletion and C/O ratios
论文作者
论文摘要
对原月球磁盘的观察结果表明它们是复杂而动态的,气体和尘埃的垂直和径向运输与化学和行星形成同时发生。先前的原星盘模型主要集中在静态磁盘中气体和粉尘的化学演化,或化学被动磁盘中固体的动态演化。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的1D方法,用于同时建模卵石生长和化学。气体和小尘埃颗粒可以垂直扩散,在磁盘的所有高度上连接化学。假定卵石是从中平面周围存在的灰尘中形成的,从而继承了该位置的ICE的组成。我们在Co Snowline内外的各个位置的1 $ m_ \ odot $ star围绕1 $ m_ \ odot $ star介绍了该模型的结果。我们发现,对于湍流磁盘($α= 10^{ - 3} $),CO从磁盘的表面层耗尽了大约1-2个数量级,与原始磁盘的观察一致。这是由冰隔离和降低紫外线不透明度的结合来实现的,这两者都由卵石生长驱动。此外,我们发现通过卵石生长选择性去除冰物种,隔离可以增加气相c/o比大约统一的值。但是,我们的模型无法产生$ \ sim的$ \ sim $ 1.5-2.0从原球门磁盘观测中推断出来,这意味着选择性隔离不足以解释c/o比率$> 1 $。
Observations of protoplanetary disks have revealed them to be complex and dynamic, with vertical and radial transport of gas and dust occurring simultaneously with chemistry and planet formation. Previous models of protoplanetary disks focused primarily on chemical evolution of gas and dust in a static disk, or dynamical evolution of solids in a chemically passive disk. In this paper, we present a new 1D method for modelling pebble growth and chemistry simultaneously. Gas and small dust particles are allowed to diffuse vertically, connecting chemistry at all elevations of the disk. Pebbles are assumed to form from the dust present around the midplane, inheriting the composition of ices at this location. We present the results of this model after 1 Myr of disk evolution around a 1$M_\odot$ star at various locations both inside and outside of the CO snowline. We find that for a turbulent disk ($α= 10^{-3}$), CO is depleted from the surface layers of the disk by roughly 1-2 orders of magnitude, consistent with observations of protoplanetary disks. This is achieved by a combination of ice sequestration and decreasing UV opacity, both driven by pebble growth. Further, we find the selective removal of ice species via pebble growth and sequestration can increase gas phase C/O ratios to values of approximately unity. However, our model is unable to produce C/O values of $\sim$1.5-2.0 inferred from protoplanetary disk observations, implying selective sequestration of ice is not sufficient to explain C/O ratios $>1$.