论文标题

X射线形态在自我互动暗物质中

X-ray morphology of cluster-mass haloes in self-interacting dark matter

论文作者

Shen, Xuejian, Brinckmann, Thejs, Rapetti, David, Vogelsberger, Mark, Mantz, Adam, Zavala, Jesús, Allen, Steven W.

论文摘要

我们对$ 19 $放松的集群质量光环进行宇宙学缩放模拟,其中包含绝热气体在冷暗物质(CDM)和自我相互作用的暗物质(SIDM)模型中。这些群集从父母模拟中选择为动态放松的簇,该簇从父母模拟中选择$ m _ {\ rm 200} \ simeq 1 \ operatatorName { - } 3 \ times 10^{15} \,{\ rm m} _ {\ rm m} _ {\ odot} $。 SIDM中的暗物质和簇内气体分布都比其CDM对应物更为球形。模拟X射线图像是根据模拟生成的,并与从Chandra和Rosat档案中选择的$ 84 $放松群集的真实X射线图像进行了比较。我们对模拟和真实X射线图像的同流执行椭圆拟合,并在以$ r \ simeq 0.1 \ operatatorName { - } 0.2 \,r _ {\ rm 200} $中获得以集群为中心的半径的椭圆度。横截面增加的SIDM模型中的X射线同流比其CDM对应物更圆,这表现为椭圆率分布函数的系统变化。出乎意料的是,观察到的非冷核簇的X射线形态与具有横截面$(σ/m)= 0.5 \ propatatorName { - } 1〜 {\ rm cm}^2/{\ rm g} $的SIDM模型更一致。 cm}^2/{\ rm g} $。我们的统计分析表明,后两个模型以$ 68 \%$置信度的水平(作为保守的估计)不利。通过移动测量的径向范围或应用温度选择标准,不会改变此结论。但是,主要的不确定性源于绝热模型中缺乏男性物理学,例如冷却,恒星形成和反馈效应,这些效应仍然有可能使CDM模拟与观察结果调和。

We perform cosmological zoom-in simulations of $19$ relaxed cluster-mass haloes with the inclusion of adiabatic gas in the cold dark matter (CDM) and self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) models. These clusters are selected as dynamically relaxed clusters from a parent simulation with $M_{\rm 200} \simeq 1\operatorname{-}3\times 10^{15}\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$. Both the dark matter and the intracluster gas distributions in SIDM appear more spherical than their CDM counterparts. Mock X-ray images are generated based on the simulations and are compared to the real X-ray images of $84$ relaxed clusters selected from the Chandra and ROSAT archives. We perform ellipse fitting for the isophotes of mock and real X-ray images and obtain the ellipticities at cluster-centric radii of $r\simeq 0.1\operatorname{-}0.2\,R_{\rm 200}$. The X-ray isophotes in SIDM models with increasing cross-sections are rounder than their CDM counterparts, which manifests as a systematic shift in the distribution function of ellipticities. Unexpectedly, the X-ray morphology of the observed non-cool-core clusters agrees better with SIDM models with cross-section $(σ/m)= 0.5\operatorname{-}1~{\rm cm}^2/{\rm g}$ than CDM and SIDM with $(σ/m)=0.1\,{\rm cm}^2/{\rm g}$. Our statistical analysis indicates that the latter two models are disfavored at the $68\%$ confidence level (as conservative estimates). This conclusion is not altered by shifting the radial range of measurements or applying temperature selection criterion. However, the primary uncertainty originates from the lack of baryonic physics in the adiabatic model, such as cooling, star formation and feedback effects, which still have the potential to reconcile CDM simulations with observations.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源