论文标题
从多种类型伽马射线来源的能源依赖时间延迟的观察结果 - 第一部分的第一组延迟,第一部分。动机,方法描述和验证通过H.E.S.S.
First Combined Study on LIV from Observations of Energy-dependent Time Delays from Multiple-type Gamma-ray Sources -- Part I. Motivation, Method Description and Validation through Simulations of H.E.S.S., MAGIC and VERITAS Datasets
论文作者
论文摘要
伽马射线天文学已成为测试真空中光子修饰的分散关系(MDR)的主要实验方法之一,该方法是在某些尝试中获得量子重力理论的尝试。使用中的MDR意味着取决于能量的时间延迟,并且在红移的某些功能之后随着距离而增加。瞬态或可变,遥远和高能的来源的使用已经使我们能够对与这种现象相关的能量尺度设置严格的限制,通常被认为是普朗克能量的顺序,但是对MDR相关的宣传效应的存在的强大结论仍然需要对大量人群的分析来源分析。 为了收集在Teraelectronvolt Energies上使用MDR搜索的最大来源样本,H.E.S.S.,Magic和Veritas合作制定了联合工作组,以结合其所有相关数据以限制量子重力能量量表。在本文中,用来详细描述了用于结合数据并提供共同限制的可能性方法,并通过模拟伽马射线爆发的记录数据集,三个燃烧的活性银河系核和两个脉冲星进行了测试。评估统计和系统错误,并将其包括在可能性的可能性中。另外,首次对时间滞后的距离依赖性进行了两种不同的形式主义的比较。在第二篇文章中,该方法将应用于三个实验的所有相关数据。
Gamma-ray astronomy has become one of the main experimental ways to test the modified dispersion relations (MDRs) of photons in vacuum, obtained in some attempts to formulate a theory of Quantum Gravity. The MDRs in use imply time delays which depend on the energy, and which increase with distance following some function of redshift. The use of transient, or variable, distant and highly energetic sources, already allows us to set stringent limits on the energy scale related to this phenomenon, usually thought to be of the order of the Planck energy, but robust conclusions on the existence of MDR-related propagation effects still require the analysis of a large population of sources. In order to gather the biggest sample of sources possible for MDR searches at teraelectronvolt energies, the H.E.S.S., MAGIC and VERITAS collaborations enacted a joint task force to combine all their relevant data to constrain the Quantum Gravity energy scale. In the present article, the likelihood method used, to combine the data and provide a common limit, is described in detail and tested through simulations of recorded data sets for a gamma-ray burst, three flaring active galactic nuclei and two pulsars. Statistical and systematic errors are assessed and included in the likelihood as nuisance parameters. In addition, a comparison of two different formalisms for distance dependence of the time lags is performed for the first time. In a second article, to appear later, the method will be applied on all relevant data from the three experiments.