论文标题
GAIA EDR3的仙女座的适当运动:确认了几乎径向轨道
The proper motion of Andromeda from Gaia eDR3: confirming a nearly radial orbit
论文作者
论文摘要
我们根据Gaia任务的第三个数据发布,对仙女座星系(M31)的适当运动进行了分析。我们使用Gaia光度法选择年轻的蓝色主序列星,并应用几种质量切割以获取这些示踪剂的干净样品。在纠正了M31磁盘运动内部旋转的正确运动测量之后,我们在GAIA参考框架方面得出了52.5 +/- 5.8 MUAS/YR的明显运动,或在应用于从M31和A ComeriCecouse的20度内确定的零点校正后,或者在零点校正后,从Quasars确定的零点校正后,或61.9 +/- 9.7 MUAS/YR。考虑太阳反射运动的考虑,我们沿右升升提升(40.0.0 +/- 39.3 km/s沿着银色的速度)和-59.4 +/30.3 km/s clycination and-39.3 km/s沿42.2 +/- 39.3 km/s之间推断出42.2 +/- 39.3 km/s之间的银河系之间的相对速度。沿银河纬度),总横向速度为v_trans = 82.4 +/- 31.2 km/s。这些值与早期的哈勃空间望远镜测量值(但比更准确)一致,这些测量可以预测两个星系之间未来的合并。我们还注意到,M31中的蓝色恒星与似乎位于银河系中的红色恒星样品之间的适当运动发生了惊人的差异。我们提出了几个假设来解释差异,但没有发现当前数据特权的明确证据。
We present an analysis of the proper motion of the Andromeda galaxy (M31), based on the Early Third Data Release of the Gaia mission. We use the Gaia photometry to select young blue main sequence stars, and apply several quality cuts to obtain clean samples of these tracers. After correcting the proper motion measurements for the internal rotation of the M31 disk motion, we derive an apparent motion of 52.5 +/- 5.8 muas/yr with respect to the Gaia reference frame, or 61.9 +/- 9.7 muas/yr after applying a zero-point correction determined from quasars within 20 degrees from M31 and a correction from systemic biases. Accounting for the Solar reflex motion we deduce a relative velocity between Andromeda and the Milky way (in a non-rotating frame at the current location of the Sun) of 42.2 +/- 39.3 km/s along right ascension (40.0 +/- 39.3 km/s along galactic longitude) and -59.4 +/- 30.3 km/s along declination (-60.9 +/- 30.3 km/s along galactic latitude), with a total transverse velocity of V_trans = 82.4 +/- 31.2 km/s. These values are consistent with (but more accurate than) earlier Hubble Space Telescope measurements that predict a future merger between the two galaxies. We also note a surprisingly large difference in the derived proper motion between the blue stars in M31 and samples of red stars that appear to lie in that galaxy. We propose several hypotheses to explain the discrepancy but found no clear evidence with the current data to privilege any one of them.