论文标题

Derisk数据库:海上风力涡轮机的极端设计波

The DeRisk database: Extreme Design Waves for Offshore Wind Turbines

论文作者

Pierella, Fabio, Lindberg, Ole, Bredmose, Henrik, Bingham, Harry B., Read, Robert W., Engsig-Karup, Allan Peter

论文摘要

从波浪中估算极端载荷是海上风力涡轮机设计的重要组成部分。标准设计代码建议使用基于常规波的简化方法或执行完全非线性计算。前者可能无法提供极端波的准确表示,而后者在计算上对于设计迭代来说太密集了。我们通过使用完全非线性求解器OceanWave3D来解决这些局限性,以建立DERISK数据库,DERISK数据库是二维域中极端波动运动学的大数据集。从数据库中,设计师可以通过在数据库中识别合适的计算,并在需要的情况下通过缩放运动学来提取全非线性波运动学,以解决波浪条件和感兴趣的水深度。 非线性求解器通过两个不同的水深度(33.0美元)和20.0美元[m] $进行了验证,并在分析案例中找到了出色的协议。这些实验用于校准OceanWave3D的数值断裂过滤器常数,并且发现最佳一致性是$β= 0.5 $。我们将实验静电力与Derisk数据库和Rainey Force模型以及最先进的工业实践进行了比较。对于温和的风暴,我们在本方法与标准方法之间的预测极限方面发现了一个很好的一致性。在深处的位置和更强的暴风雨中,由于波浪破裂而施加巨大的载荷给出了最大的载荷。在这种情况下,数据库方法比嵌入式流函数方法的准确性不如WiFi JIP方法学更准确,提供了通常的非保守估计。对于较浅的位置的强风暴,波浪破裂的主导程度较低,数据库方法论总体上是最准确的。

The estimation of extreme loads from waves is an essential part of the design of an offshore wind turbine. Standard design codes suggest to either use simplified methods based on regular waves, or to perform fully nonlinear computations. The former might not provide an accurate representation of the extreme waves, while the latter is computationally too intensive for design iterations. We address these limitations by using the fully nonlinear solver OceanWave3D to establish the DeRisk database, a large dataset of extreme waves kinematics in a two-dimensional domain. From the database, which is open and freely available, a designer can extract fully-nonlinear wave kinematics for a wave condition and water depth of interest by identifying a suitable computation in the database and, if needed, by Froude-scaling the kinematics. The nonlinear solver is validated against the DeRisk model experiments at two different water depths, $33.0 [m]$ and $20.0 [m]$, and an excellent agreement is found for the analyzed cases. The experiments are used to calibrate OceanWave3D's numerical breaking filter constant, and the best agreement is found for $β=0.5$. We compare the experimental static force with predictions by the DeRisk database and the Rainey force model, and with state-of-the-art industrial practices. For milder storms, we find a good agreement in the predicted extreme force between the present methodology and the standard methodologies. At the deep location and for stronger storms, the largest loads are given by slamming loads due to breaking waves. In this condition, the database methodology is less accurate than the embedded stream function method and more accurate than the WiFi JIP methodology, providing generally nonconservative estimates. For strong storms at the shallower location, where wave breaking is less dominating, the database methodology is the most accurate overall.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源