论文标题
基于任务的交互式连续制图的有效性
Task-Based Effectiveness of Interactive Contiguous Area Cartograms
论文作者
论文摘要
制图是基于地图的数据可视化,其中每个地图区域的面积与相关的数字数据值(例如人口或国内生产总值)成正比。如果制图符合该区域原理,同时还将相邻区域连接起来,则称为连续性。由于外观扭曲,连续制图被批评为难以阅读。一些作者建议,如果制图伴随着交互式功能(例如动画,链接的刷牙或Infotips),则它们可能更加清晰。我们进行了一个实验来评估这一主张。参与者必须执行具有交互式和非相互作用连续制图的视觉分析任务。任务类型涵盖了制图可读性的各个方面,从基本查找任务到概要任务(即参与者必须总结两个摄影图之间的高级差异的任务)。在没有互动的情况下,基本任务同样很好地执行。相比之下,如果没有交互功能,概括的任务就更加困难。但是,随着互动性的访问,大多数参与者甚至正确回答了概要问题。在随后的调查中,参与者将互动功能评为“易于使用”和“有帮助”。我们的研究表明,即使对于那些不熟悉交互式计算机图形的读者或对使用地图工作的读者,互动性也有可能使连续制作图可以访问。在交互功能中,动画具有最强的积极效果,因此当在计算机屏幕上显示连续的摄影图时,我们建议它们是最小的交互性。
Cartograms are map-based data visualizations in which the area of each map region is proportional to an associated numeric data value (e.g., population or gross domestic product). A cartogram is called contiguous if it conforms to this area principle while also keeping neighboring regions connected. Because of their distorted appearance, contiguous cartograms have been criticized as difficult to read. Some authors have suggested that cartograms may be more legible if they are accompanied by interactive features (e.g., animations, linked brushing, or infotips). We conducted an experiment to evaluate this claim. Participants had to perform visual analysis tasks with interactive and noninteractive contiguous cartograms. The task types covered various aspects of cartogram readability, ranging from elementary lookup tasks to synoptic tasks (i.e., tasks in which participants had to summarize high-level differences between two cartograms). Elementary tasks were carried out equally well with and without interactivity. Synoptic tasks, by contrast, were more difficult without interactive features. With access to interactivity, however, most participants answered even synoptic questions correctly. In a subsequent survey, participants rated the interactive features as "easy to use" and "helpful." Our study suggests that interactivity has the potential to make contiguous cartograms accessible even for those readers who are unfamiliar with interactive computer graphics or do not have a prior affinity to working with maps. Among the interactive features, animations had the strongest positive effect, so we recommend them as a minimum of interactivity when contiguous cartograms are displayed on a computer screen.