论文标题
POINCARE：通过治疗效果估算推荐出版场所
Poincare: Recommending Publication Venues via Treatment Effect Estimation
论文作者
论文摘要
选择学术论文的出版物场所是研究过程中的关键一步。但是，在许多情况下，决策仅基于研究人员的经验，这通常会导致次优结果。尽管存在用于学术论文的场地推荐系统，但他们推荐了预计将发表该论文的场所。在这项研究中，我们旨在从不同的角度推荐出版场所。我们估计，如果在每个场所发表论文，并推荐该论文具有最大影响力的场地，我们将收到的引用数量。但是，这项任务面临两个挑战。首先，仅在一个地点发表论文，因此，如果该论文发表在另一个地点，我们无法观察到该论文收到的引用数量。其次，论文和出版物场所的内容在统计上是独立的。也就是说，选择出版场所存在选择偏见。在本文中，我们将场地推荐问题作为治疗效果估计问题提出。我们使用偏见校正方法来估计有效选择出版物场地的潜在影响，并根据每个场所对论文的潜在影响推荐场地。我们使用来自计算机科学会议的纸质数据强调了我们方法的有效性。
Choosing a publication venue for an academic paper is a crucial step in the research process. However, in many cases, decisions are based solely on the experience of researchers, which often leads to suboptimal results. Although there exist venue recommender systems for academic papers, they recommend venues where the paper is expected to be published. In this study, we aim to recommend publication venues from a different perspective. We estimate the number of citations a paper will receive if the paper is published in each venue and recommend the venue where the paper has the most potential impact. However, there are two challenges to this task. First, a paper is published in only one venue, and thus, we cannot observe the number of citations the paper would receive if the paper were published in another venue. Secondly, the contents of a paper and the publication venue are not statistically independent; that is, there exist selection biases in choosing publication venues. In this paper, we formulate the venue recommendation problem as a treatment effect estimation problem. We use a bias correction method to estimate the potential impact of choosing a publication venue effectively and to recommend venues based on the potential impact of papers in each venue. We highlight the effectiveness of our method using paper data from computer science conferences.
