论文标题
高对比度成像的微电机电可变形镜开发,第2部分:量化误差对冠状图对比造影剂的影响
Microelectromechanical deformable mirror development for high-contrast imaging, part 2: the impact of quantization errors on coronagraph image contrast
论文作者
论文摘要
恒星冠状动脉依赖于可变形的镜子(DMS)来纠正波前错误并创建高对比度图像。对DM的不完善控制限制了可实现的对比度,因此,DM控制电子必须提供良好的表面高度分辨率和低噪声。在这里,我们使用NASA的Jet推进实验室(JPL)的高对比度成像测试台(HCIT)设施中的实验数据研究了由于DM电子对图像对比度的量化误差的影响。我们发现,与实际情况相比,最简单的分析模型给出了乐观的预测,其对比度高达3倍,从而导致DM表面高度分辨率的要求不正确地放松了70%。我们表明,考虑到DM执行器形状或影响功能,可以改善分析预测。但是,我们还发现,波前感应和控制过程的端到端数值模拟提供了最准确的预测,并建议采用对DM控制电子设置强大要求的这种方法。从我们的实验和数值结果中,我们得出结论,在未来空间望远镜上使用冠状动脉仪器的波长至450nm的波长,在太阳能恒星周围的温带陆地系外行星需要大约6pm的表面高度分辨率。最后,我们列出了量化错误的可识别特征,这些特征可能有助于确定它们是否是限制因素。
Stellar coronagraphs rely on deformable mirrors (DMs) to correct wavefront errors and create high contrast images. Imperfect control of the DM limits the achievable contrast and, therefore, the DM control electronics must provide fine surface height resolution and low noise. Here, we study the impact of quantization errors due to the DM electronics on the image contrast using experimental data from the High Contrast Imaging Testbed (HCIT) facility at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). We find that the simplest analytical model gives optimistic predictions compared to real cases, with contrast up to 3 times better, which leads to DM surface height resolution requirements that are incorrectly relaxed by 70%. We show that taking into account the DM actuator shape, or influence function, improves the analytical predictions. However, we also find that end-to-end numerical simulations of the wavefront sensing and control process provide the most accurate predictions and recommend such an approach for setting robust requirements on the DM control electronics. From our experimental and numerical results, we conclude that a surface height resolution of approximately 6pm is required for imaging temperate terrestrial exoplanets around Solar-type stars at wavelengths as small as 450nm with coronagraph instruments on future space telescopes. Finally, we list the recognizable characteristics of quantization errors that may help determine if they are a limiting factor.