论文标题

科学后的工厂报告会符合《深度学习》的工程,2019年神经学习,温哥华

Post-Workshop Report on Science meets Engineering in Deep Learning, NeurIPS 2019, Vancouver

论文作者

Sagun, Levent, Gulcehre, Caglar, Romero, Adriana, Rostamzadeh, Negar, Mannelli, Stefano Sarao

论文摘要

科学在深度学习中与工程会面是在温哥华举行的,这是Neurips 2019研讨会部分的一部分。作为研讨会的组织者,我们创建了以下报告,以试图隔离整个活动中介绍的新兴主题和重复的主题。尽管近年来取得了巨大的成功,但深度学习仍然可以成为艺术和工程的复杂结合。该研讨会旨在全面聚集人们,以应对他们正在处理的问题中看似与之形成鲜明对比的挑战。作为呼吁研讨会的一部分,特别关注建筑,数据和优化的相互依赖性,这引起了设计和性能复杂性的巨大景观,这些景观并不理解。今年,我们的目标是强调社区中的以下方向:(i)确定更好的模型和算法的障碍; (ii)确定我们希望从中建立科学和潜在理论理解的一般趋势; (iii)科学实验和实验方案的严格设计,其目的是解决和确定奥秘的起源,同时确保结论的可重复性和鲁棒性。在这种情况下,这些主题出现并广泛讨论,与我们的期望相匹配,并为这些方向的新研究铺平了道路。尽管我们承认文本通过镜头自然存在偏见,但在这里,我们提出了一项公平的工作来突出研讨会的结果。

Science meets Engineering in Deep Learning took place in Vancouver as part of the Workshop section of NeurIPS 2019. As organizers of the workshop, we created the following report in an attempt to isolate emerging topics and recurring themes that have been presented throughout the event. Deep learning can still be a complex mix of art and engineering despite its tremendous success in recent years. The workshop aimed at gathering people across the board to address seemingly contrasting challenges in the problems they are working on. As part of the call for the workshop, particular attention has been given to the interdependence of architecture, data, and optimization that gives rise to an enormous landscape of design and performance intricacies that are not well-understood. This year, our goal was to emphasize the following directions in our community: (i) identify obstacles in the way to better models and algorithms; (ii) identify the general trends from which we would like to build scientific and potentially theoretical understanding; and (iii) the rigorous design of scientific experiments and experimental protocols whose purpose is to resolve and pinpoint the origin of mysteries while ensuring reproducibility and robustness of conclusions. In the event, these topics emerged and were broadly discussed, matching our expectations and paving the way for new studies in these directions. While we acknowledge that the text is naturally biased as it comes through our lens, here we present an attempt to do a fair job of highlighting the outcome of the workshop.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源