论文标题
对有效领域理论和自发对称性破坏的误解:对埃利斯的文章的反应
Misconceptions on Effective Field Theories and spontaneous symmetry breaking: Response to Ellis' article
论文作者
论文摘要
在较早的论文〜\ cite {luu:2019jmb}中,我们从有效的场理论的背景下讨论了出现,特别是与粒子和核物理领域有关。我们在还原主义和疲软的出现方面争论。乔治·埃利斯(George Ellis)在〜\ cite {ellis:2020vij}中批评了我们的论述,在这里我们对他的批评作出了回应。他的许多批评是基于与有效领域理论的形式主义有关的错误假设,我们试图在此处纠正这些问题。我们还评论他的论文中的其他陈述。要注意的是,我们的回应是对他在档案版中的批评:2004.13591V1-5 [physics.hist-ph]。也就是说,该档案帖子的版本1-5。版本6具有与版本1-5相似的内容,但版本7-9似乎完全是不同的纸张(即使标题不同)。
In an earlier paper~\cite{Luu:2019jmb} we discussed emergence from the context of effective field theories, particularly as related to the fields of particle and nuclear physics. We argued on the side of reductionism and weak emergence. George Ellis has critiqued our exposition in~\cite{Ellis:2020vij}, and here we provide our response to his critiques. Many of his critiques are based on incorrect assumptions related to the formalism of effective field theories and we attempt to correct these issues here. We also comment on other statements made in his paper. Important to note is that our response is to his critiques made in archive versions arXiv:2004.13591v1-5 [physics.hist-ph]. That is, versions 1-5 of this archive post. Version 6 has similar content as versions 1-5, but versions 7-9 are seemingly a different paper altogether (even with a different title).