论文标题
对甜点等评论的回应。 “ 3.5 keV线的暗物质解释与空白的观察结果不一致”
Response to a comment on Dessert et al. "The dark matter interpretation of the 3.5 keV line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations"
论文作者
论文摘要
我们在Dessert等人中的工作强烈不利于3.5 KEV系的暗物质解释。 2020年。Boyarsky等。 2020年结论的问题：对其他背景线进行建模，以使极限充分削弱以重新允许暗物质解释。我们的回应如下。 1）通过对其他线进行建模来获得更保守的限制；这一点在我们在Dessert等人中的工作中全部出现，尽管我们还表明，不需要包含此类行。 2）尽管Boyarsky等人提出了建议，但即使是更为保守的限制也强烈不利于3.5 KeV系列的腐烂的暗物质起源。
The dark matter explanation of the 3.5 keV line is strongly disfavored by our work in Dessert et al. 2020. Boyarsky et al. 2020 questions that conclusion: modeling additional background lines is claimed to weaken the limit sufficiently to re-allow a dark matter interpretation. We respond as follows. 1) A more conservative limit is obtained by modeling additional lines; this point appeared in its entirety in our work in Dessert et al., though we also showed that the inclusion of such lines is not necessary. 2) Despite suggestions in Boyarsky et al., even the more conservative limits strongly disfavor a decaying dark matter origin of the 3.5 keV line.
