论文标题
基于学习的停止功率映射质子辐射疗法的双能CT
Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy
论文作者
论文摘要
目的:双能CT(DECT)已通过获得光子相互作用的能量依赖性来得出相对停止功率(RSP)图。使用基于物理学的映射技术时,图像噪声水平和伪像的严重程度可能会损害代码的RSP图,这将影响随后的临床应用。这项工作提出了一种基于噪声的学习方法,可以预测DECT中的RSP图以进行质子辐射疗法。方法:所提出的方法使用残留的注意周期一致生成对抗(Cyclegan)网络。使用Cyclegan通过引入反RSP-toce-dect映射来使DECT-RSP映射接近一对一的映射。我们回顾性地研究了20名在质子放射疗法模拟中进行DECT扫描的头颈癌患者。基于化学成分的计算分配了基础真实RSP值,并用作DECT数据集的训练过程中的学习目标,并使用剩余的交叉验证策略对拟议方法的结果进行了评估。结果:预测的RSP图显示,整个体积的平均均值均方根误差(NMSE)为2.83%,平均平均误差(ME)在所有感兴趣的体积(VOIS)中低于3%。在DECT数据集中添加了其他模拟噪声的情况下,该提出的方法仍然保持了可比的性能,而基于物理的化学计量方法则遭受了从噪声水平提高的降解降解。临床目标体积(CTV)的DVH指标的平均差异小于D95%和DMAX的0.2 Gy,而无统计学意义。结论:这些结果强烈表明我们基于机器学习方法预测的RSP地图的高精度,并显示了其对质子治疗计划和剂量计算的潜在可行性。
Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) map by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques, which would affect subsequent clinical applications. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy. Methods: The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial (CycleGAN) network. CycleGAN were used to let the DECT-to-RSP mapping be close to a one-to-one mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. We retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions, and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets, and were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy. Results: The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error (NMSE) of 2.83% across the whole body volume, and average mean error (ME) less than 3% in all volumes of interest (VOIs). With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences in DVH metrics for clinical target volumes (CTVs) were less than 0.2 Gy for D95% and Dmax with no statistical significance. Conclusion: These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning-based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.