论文标题

防风电场的下一次预防维护活动的最佳安排

Optimal scheduling of the next preventive maintenance activity for a wind farm

论文作者

Yu, Quanjiang, Patriksson, Michael, Sagitov, Serik

论文摘要

风电场的大部分运营成本是由于设备维护成本,尤其是海上风电场。本文的重点是如何降低维护成本,因此提高盈利能力。它提出了一个二进制线性优化模型,该模型的解决方案可能建议将零件的风力涡轮机所有者进行,何时应进行下一个预防性维护(PM)替换。建议的短期调度策略考虑了多组件系统的最终故障事件,因为在修复故障系统后,应更新先前安排的PM计划,前提是恢复的组件与新的相同。 本文的优化算法NextPM通过应用于风力涡轮机的四组分模型的数值案例研究进行了测试。第一个研究涉及用于参数校准目的的单个组件系统的重要情况。第二项研究分析了动员成本的季节性变化,与持续的动员成本设定相比。除其他事项外,与纯纠正维护(CM)策略相比,该分析揭示了NextPM模型实现35%的成本降低。在这两个案例研究中,成本降低了。第三个案例研究将NextPM模型与另一个优化模型进行了比较 - 预防性维护调度问题与间隔成本(PMSPIC),这是本文灵感的主要来源。该比较表明,NextPM模型在计算时间方面是准确且更快的。

A large part of the operational cost for a wind power farm is due to the cost of equipment maintenance, especially for offshore wind farms. How to reduce the maintenance cost, and hence increase profitability, is this article's focus. It presents a binary linear optimization model whose solution may suggest the wind turbine owners which components, and when, should undergo the next preventive maintenance (PM) replacements. The suggested short-term scheduling strategy takes into account eventual failure events of the multi-component system, in that after the failed system is repaired, the previously scheduled PM plan should be updated, assuming that the restored components are as good as new. The optimization algorithm of this paper, NextPM, is tested through numerical case studies applied to a four component model of a wind turbine. The first study addresses the important case of a single component system, used for parameter calibration purposes. The second study analyses the case of seasonal variations of mobilization costs, as compared to the constant mobilization cost setting. Among other things, this analysis reveals a 35% cost reduction achieved by the NextPM model, as compared to the pure corrective maintenance (CM) strategy. %In these two case studies, the costs are reduced by around. The third case study compares the NextPM model with another optimization model - the preventive maintenance scheduling problem with interval costs (PMSPIC), which was the major source of inspiration for this article. This comparison demonstrates that the NextPM model is accurate and much faster in terms of computational time.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源